A full report of the 284-page report only acquired by Dailynewsvibe, demonstrated that the majority of the political on-screen characters were arraigned for utilizing hooligans to upset the 2007 and 2011 surveys while top INEC authorities were reviled for helping and abetting the degenerate government officials to get into office by bamboozling amid the surveys.
The report obviously demonstrated that while top INEC authorities included underserved votes in favor of favored legislators, others denied bothered applicants access to appointive materials to have the capacity to challenge their rivals all in an offer for them to accomplish foreordained result for their "blessed" hopefuls.
On account of Professor Maurice Iwu, the previous National Chairman of the INEC, the report has prescribed that an authoritative discipline be dispensed to him for not making pertinent appointive materials accessible to previous Vice President Atiku Abubakar to challenge the revelation recently President Umaru Yar'Adua as President in 2007.
Iwu was prosecuted in the judgment conveyed by Justice Niki Toby, who noticed that it wasn't right for INEC to have denied Atiku access to significant materials on the reason that doing as such would postpone the fast determination of the case, along these lines denying the previous Vice president reasonable hearing. Equity Niki Toby prescribed that Iwu ought to be made to answer 27 questions on why he kept Atiku from getting reasonable hearing on the sacred place of quick determination of the Yarádua case. Atiku had tested the rise of Yarádua as the president and drew nearer the Appeal Court to set aside the statement taking into account watched irregularities however was kept from getting the needed help from the INEC, an improvement the Supreme Court grimaced at.
Toby said in his last judgment: "Official courtrooms can't give up the sacred standard of reasonable hearing on the sacrificial stone of fast becoming aware of situations when the substance of quick hearing is not in consonance with reasonable hearing in the feeling of profiting the gatherings, as in the moment request, the privilege to regulate interrogatories.
"A gathering that is qualified for interrogatories and is denied that privilege, is denied the privilege to reasonable hearing. In the moment case, the advance court wasn't right in dismissing the application by Atiku to direct interrogatories on the ground that it would block rapid trial of the case. Accordinly, I am of the firm view that Prof Maurice Iwu ought to answer the 27 questions postured for determination," the judge ruled.
IN another dubious choice taken by the INEC in appreciation of the governorship tussle between Alhaji Muhammadu Maigari Dingyadi and previous Governor Aliyu Magatakarda Wamakko, the NHRC report slipped intensely on INEC as being unreliable and willing to do the offering of specific lawmakers to distort the course of equity. It prescribed that the authorities of INEC who executed the unnatural birth cycle of equity in Sokoto must be created and rebuffed by the commission.
"It said, "The officers of INEC have for this situation depicted the commission as a reckless association which is prepared to execute illicitness and abandon the early vote based system for reasons unknown best known not.
It is clear from the circumstances of this case the INEC was working with gloves close by with some political gatherings in Sokoto to distort the reason for equity. The electorates are underestimated and this is extremely heartbreaking," the Supreme Court ruled.
For another situation, the report solicited the Inspector General from Police to deliver a mob policeman, who shot and killed three people on the Election Day at Ward 6 and 7 in Ogume in Delta State amid House of Representative decision between Hon. Ossai Nicholas Ossai and another in 2011.
The policeman, whose name was not recorded in the report, as per the Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Prof Bem Angwe, are to be looks out by the IGP for arraignment for killing pure Nigerians as opposed to securing them on the decision day. Prof Angwe said that the commission was prepared to go hard and fast to guarantee that the proposals of the report upheld by universal advancement offices like Ford Foundation, DfID and OSIWA, was completely actualized to diminish the frequency of appointive acts of neglect in future surveys.
The majority of the offenses, which are criminal in nature, are being alluded to the Attorney General of the Federation for indictment while the authoritative ones are to be taken care of by the INEC and different offices of the organization.